Slow Export to JPG

DxO PhotoLab Windows topics
21

Ahh ok.
8K are probably only some extra metadata somewhere.
Do a full dump of metadata from the two files:

exiftool /from_faststone.jpg > /from_faststone.txt
exiftool /from_embedded.jpg > /from_embedded.txt

and see what else there are in them.

For fun, you could open one of them in a photo editor and then add the other one as a second layer but invert the color it and set opacity to 50%. If they are pixel identical their totals should cancel each other out and you should end up with a 50% gray photo. :slight_smile:

22

Hi Required,

EXIF data is much richer in JPG converted by FastStone than JPG extracted directly from NEF file.

Exif%20Details%20from%20FastStone
Exif Details from FastStone.png752×1039 32.1 KB

Exif%20Details%20from%20Exiftool
Exif Details from Exiftool.png752×367 13 KB

The fact is that JPG by FastStone having richer EXIF with smaller file size. Interesting enough!

For another test by applying layer you suggest, since I don’t use layer to process image, I may need time to study how to perform. Will let you know if I have some findings.

Thanks for you idea!