Screens are at least sRGB capable but they are not sRGB. Screens have their own color profile. Apple screens profiles are different from Samsung screens profiles (i.e. color spaces are different even if sRGB capable). What you see in your screen with Photolab 6 and Wide Gamut selected, is the conversion of Wide Gamut in the screen color space, not in sRGB color space.
Therefore, if you export an image to sRGB color space and want to see what will be your image after export, you have to make a soft proofing, Wide Gamut to sRGB, exactly as you would do for printing, Wide Gamut to printer color profile.
Photolab 5 is WYS|WYG for one simple reason :
If in your camera you select Adobe 1998 for your photographies, working color space in Photolab 5 is Adobe 1998. If in your camera you select sRGB for your photographies, working color space in Photolab 5 is sRGB.
Then, if in the export options you keep for export, the original color space selected in your camera, Adobe to Adobe, sRGB to sRGB, that means that you do not change of color space and therefore, no soft proofing is necessary: WYS/WYG.
If you export an image from Adobe 1998 to sRGB as far as the difference of size between these two color spaces is not huge you will not see a big differences… if any.
This is not true. PhotoLab 5 has a working (internal) color space of Adobe RGB, always, and RAW files have no defined color space - the gamut is that of the camera sensor. It’s too easy to confuse what is meant by a working color space.
I got this information directly from DxO support years ago when I wondered what was the working color space of DxO Optics Pro (I started using DxO soft with DxO Optics Pro 7 in 2008, Photolab being only a renaming of Optics Pro). But maybe I got a wrong information; it is possible. We never know…
It seems you misinterpreted the info you received, Paule - - PL’s Classic Working Color Space indeed is Adobe-RGB … but that does not have the implications that you suppose it does.
The 3rd link provided by Egregious/Greg (listed just above) directly addresses this point.
… and you are capturing RAW files ONLY, then it makes no difference (as explained in the 3rd link above) … BUT, if you’re capturing RAWs & JPGs then your camera will write to JPGs for the Adobe-RGB color-space … which may not look “right” when viewed on a non-capable monitor.
For those who are struggling with the topic of Colour Management and Soft Proofing, I found this article that does a really good job of explaining the workflow of RAW processing in a colour managed environment. There is a very good flowchart too.
said otherwise: there is no point in exporting an image coded in a restricted space (srgb/adobe rgb) to a larger space, so much to continue in adobe rgb
on the other hand, processing an image in a wide space (dxo wide gamut) allows much more “fine” calculations on the shades of colors and there is an interest in exporting to prophoto rgb to preserve these shades (and the saturated colors which are outside of adob or srgb) so that the printer’s printing software converts the space of the photo (prophoto) as late as possible to the smaller profile of the printer (ink - paper couple) there will gain on some rare photos in shades or saturation.
for photos that are not very saturated at the base (portraits/other…) whose colors fall into srgb, of course, nothing will be gained.
who can do more can do less.
therefore working with software whose workspace is “wide” leaves more possibilities even if in practice few photos will benefit from it
Enjoy more accurate and lifelike photos with PhotoLab 6’s new wide gamut color space.
Far exceeding Adobe RGB, it uses spectral primary colors for natural, vibrant results, particularly in highly saturated images.
The upgrade means you can boost colors while avoiding clipping in saturated regions. Plus, the new color space also means the ClearView Plus tool can achieve even better results as it has more colors to work with.
As a result, DxO PhotoLab 6 is also a perfect fit with the latest generation of wide-gamut monitors.
So, if you don’t need those benefits, stick with the older WCS or with PL5. But I like what the new WCS makes possible - and that acknowledges why customers have been asking for a wide-gamut WCS for years. So far, I’ve seen some better renderings using it even though I only output in sRGB (screen and JPEG). I haven’t decided what settings to use when exporting to TIFF: so far, I use “As Shot” which goes to sRGB, probably because that’s what I set in the camera for JPEG output. I don’t think it will be worthwhile for me to export to a wider gamut unless I actually start using a wider gamut for output I can see (screen, printing, etc). On that note, I personally wouldn’t use ProPhoto unless I wanted to work on the TIFF image further in a program that could use such a wide gamut as a WCS. Its gamut exceeds what’s visible, leading to a real risk of clipping otherwise. But FWIW, the DxO Wide Gamut WCS ensures that an export to ProPhoto stays within the visible range.
No, but as @OXiDant says, you are putting your lower gamut file in a much higher gamut colour space for NO benefit. With the WGCS in PL6 you may now get some benefit.
In the past you MAY have lost some colour without even knowing it when using the Classic Colour Space.
Which brings me to the question:
What is the correct colours for a photo? To me it is what I remember (very subjective) and what I like when I edit which is also very subjective. Is it an exact representation of the scene you photographed? I doubt it as everyone has their own interpretation.
Everyone is trying to get the perfect colours from this new colour space and soft proofing functionality rather than thinking: I can get more saturated colours but need to be more careful because it can modify the look of my photo when publishing (printing or displaying on the web etc.)