DxO Projects

(jwc) #1

Hi … does anyone know where or how DxO stores projects? I was hoping to be able to “import” a project by preparing a list of filenames and have DxO PL 2 create a project out of them. The files are spread across a few dozen directories and I have a handy list of them, but going into each directory to add the individual files through the DxO interface would be painful.

I looked in the ~/Library folder and didn’t see anything that looked promising.

(Melbourne, Australia) #2

Hi Rex.

Projects are stored in the PL database - - so, not readily accessible from outside PL.

Regards, John M

(Pascal) #3

I do not think it will ever be possible.

But I have been asking for a long time the possibility to copy / paste a path file into the library.
I hope that can be then help you.



It would be cool to be able to recover the projects because if one decides to move all his photos in a new directory, it is necessary to recreate the database with the .dop files but we lose the projects !

(Marc) #5

For me, a good piece of software is a software that helps the users reach their goals, not only perfectly, but also as fast a possible.
I hate to see someone clicking 10 times to achieve something if, with a bit of code we could drop to 5 clics -just an example-. The hard work must always be for the software engineer so that the user can enjoy and produce more -yes of course it is cost limited … but come one, we all pay-.

I wish that your demand will be heard and implemented one day.
I do not work with projects yet but it might come true soon.

Is there a vote open ?

(Pascal) #6

This is (was) the the DxO’s weak point.
The new team seems more open-minded to listen the user’s side.


(Marc) #7

I see. Thank you for the information.
This is win-win for everybody.

(jwc) #8

Pathnames are not really part of the Mac experience. I came over from Windows seven years ago and still think in terms of folders, directories, and paths, and find myself tilting at Mac windmills where the idea is to hide such details in favor of “libraries.” I can’t really fault DxO for following that UX directive.

I started digging into the DxO database using a SQL*Lite tool and getting pathnames of files in projects can be done, but I would never attempt to update this DB. In terms of features, I’d say this one ranks pretty far down the list.

(Melbourne, Australia) #9

That’s a handy observation, Rex - - just for curiosity purposes.
Like you say, tho, t’would not be smart to try updating any of the tables !

John M

(jwc) #10

In another life I was a database programmer so all of the principles of joining tables and writing queries that link columns are straightforward. The PL DB is pretty simple but seems to have a lot of cruft in it, such as references to files and directories that have nothing to do with images. Tempting to delete, but I could lose projects if I did that.